After viewing the 2 posted videos I would like to here the opinions on the following;
- Does a city and county built on tourism support the local business and protect it's economy or pass new amendments to ban events in order to ease pressure from newly relocated constituency.
- Can you ban the rights and freedoms of one group while allowing another those same freedoms.
- Each culture presents its own set of problems and rights, however, one culture has a large percent that chooses to act in a manner that includes robbery and assault, while the other holds itself to a high standard. Does this mean we can take away one groups rights or should each group have the same rights and be dealt with accordingly.
- Do residents that move to a tourist town have the same rights of expectation as those who choose to live in assimilated social societies. It is just like the people that move to a golf community and don't want golf balls on their property or their house being hit, it is what you have to live with if you choose to reside on a course for the views.
well said Micah, I myself hope that it continues, my problem is that local business agencies who should be supporting the businesses that pay their salaries have sided with local policy makers. They want to come into my shop, take $20,000 out and leave me a tax bill for doing it.